Read/review the following resources for this activity:
- Textbook: Chapter 17. Also, Chapter 11 and 12 from Week 6 might still be relevant.
- Minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.
This is Part II of the assignment you submitted in Week 6.
Using the case outline (Part I: How the Courts Address or Respect Our Rights as Citizens) you submitted in Week 6, prepare and submit a presentation, which will either be a narrated PowerPoint, a Kaltura Video, or some other format as approved by your instructor. Be sure to verify the presentation format with your instructor before starting work on this assignment.
The presentation Point presentation will need to include:
- Name the case
- Discuss the facts of the case
- Discuss the history of the case (what laws or legal action was taken)
- Discuss the issues or the facts of the case and legal questions the court must decide
- Discuss if the court’s decision or holdings was for the plaintiff or for the defendant and what were the reasons for the decision?
- Discuss the concurring and dissenting opinions from the judge or if a jury trial, the jury.
Important: In this assignment, you are expected to elaborate the points you made in the prior assignment in Week 6. This assignment will be graded on your strength to elaborate and explain the facts of the case and proper use of visual aids, good narration, and presenting to the case and how well you stick to the case. For example, if you are using the PowerPoint, you are also expected to include proper visuals that are relevant to the case. Do not copy-paste the outline into this and call it complete.
This assignment is worth 225 points.
- Length: The presentation must be 10-15 slides long if using PowerPoint (excluding cover and reference pages) or 3-5 minute long if using a video presentation.
- Font should not be smaller than size 16-point
- Parenthetical in-text citations included and formatted in APA style
- Title/Introduction slide required
- References slide minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to textbook if cited)
- Use the speaker notes to elaborate on the content on the slides
This activity will be graded based on the Written Assignment Grading Rubric.
CO 4: Assess the role of social forces such as the media, think tanks, political action committees, and quasi-governmental bodies in the making of domestic and foreign policy.
CO 6: Critically analyze the American political environment and issues relating to present day using primary and secondary sources.
CO 7: Examine their state constitution for key principles using an inquiry-based instructional model.
Civil Rights Case Evaluation
Name of the case
- The name of the case is
Loving v. Virginia.
- It was decided in 1967 in the US Supreme Court.
- It involved laws related to interracial marriages.
- In the case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against laws barring interracial marriages.
- This marriages violate the due process clauses of the 14th Amendment and the Equal Protection Act.
- The case involved Richard Loving, a white male, and Mildred Loving, a lady of color.
Facts of the Case
- The case involved Richard, a white male, and Mildred Loving, a lady of color.
- The two received a one-year prison sentence for marrying each.
- The marriage violated the Racial Integrity Act of 1924 in Virginia.
- The Act criminalized marriage between whites and people of color (Meek, 2020).
- Following their conviction, the Lovings appealed to Virginia’s Supreme Court, which upheld the ruling.
- This prompted them to appeal to the U.S. Supreme court, which agreed
Please click the following button to purchase the full answer. Also, you can order customized paper now.
has been added to your cart!
have been added to your cart!