NURS-6521 Week 4 Assignment

PHARMACOTHERAPY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL AND HEPATOBILIARY DISORDERS

Gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary disorders affect the structure and function of the GI tract. Many of these disorders often have similar symptoms, such as abdominal pain, cramping, constipation, nausea, bloating, and fatigue. Since multiple disorders can be tied to the same symptoms, it is important for advanced practice nurses to carefully evaluate patients and prescribe a treatment that targets the cause rather than the symptom.

Once the underlying cause is identified, an appropriate drug therapy plan can be recommended based on medical history and individual patient factors. In this Assignment, you examine a case study of a patient who presents with symptoms of a possible GI/hepatobiliary disorder, and you design an appropriate drug therapy plan.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

  • Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment
  • Reflect on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and drugs currently prescribed.
  • Think about a possible diagnosis for the patient. Consider whether the patient has a disorder related to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system or whether the symptoms are the result of a disorder from another system or other factors, such as pregnancy, drugs, or a psychological disorder.
  • Consider an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 4

Write a 1-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.
  • Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
  • Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center offers an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htmLinks to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

25 to >22.25 pts

Excellent
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the diagnosis for the patient, including an accurate and thorough rationale for the diagnosis that supports clinical judgment.

22.25 to >19.75 pts

Good
The response provides a basic explanation of 1-2 diagnoses for the patient, including an accurate rationale for the diagnosis that may support clinical judgment.

19.75 to >17.25 pts

Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate or vague rationale for the diagnosis that may or may not support clinical judgment.

17.25 to >0 pts

Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate and vague rationale for the diagnosis that does not support clinical judgment, or is missing.
25 pts
Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent
The response accurately and completely describes in detail an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good
The response describes a basic explanation of the appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
30 pts
Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.

30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent
The response provides an accurate, clear, and detailed justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. … The response includes specific, accurate, and detailed examples that fully support the justification provided.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good
The response provides a basic justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. … The response includes only 1-2 examples that fully support the justification provided.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair
The response provides an inaccurate or vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. … The response may include examples, which may inaccurately or vaguely support the justification provided.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor
The response provides an inaccurate and vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient, or is missing. … The response does not include examples that support the justification provided, or is missing.
30 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good
Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair
Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good
Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair
Contains several (3–4) APA format errors

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
5 pts
Total Points: 100

Dynamic Inc dynamicprofessionalwriters01@gmail.com

Mar 21, 2023, 7:46 AM (11 days ago)

to Nyanch
Case Study

DC is a 46-year-old female who presents with a 24-hour history of RUQ pain.  She states the pain started about 1 hour after a large dinner she had with her family.  She has had nausea and on instance of vomiting before presentation.

 
PMH: Vitals:
HTN Temp:  98.8oF
Type II DM Wt:       202 lbs
Gout Ht:        5’8”
DVT – Caused by oral BCPs BP:       136/82
HR:       82 bpm

 

 
Current Medications: Notable Labs:
Lisinopril 10 mg daily WBC:                13,000/mm3
HCTZ 25 mg daily Total bilirubin:    0.8 mg/dL
Allopurinol 100 mg daily Direct bilirubin:  0.6 mg/dL
Multivitamin daily Alk Phos:           100 U/L
AST:                   45 U/L
ALT:                   30 U/L

Allergies:

  • Latex
  • Codeine
  • Amoxicillin

PE:

  • Eyes: EOMI
  • HENT: Normal
  • GI:bNondistended, minimal tenderness
  • Skin:bWarm and dry
  • Neuro: Alert and Oriented
  • Psych:bAppropriate mood

Solution

Case study

The case is of a 46-year-old female with a 24-hour history of RUQ pain. She had nausea and one instance of vomiting before the presentation. She has a history of HTN, Type II DM, Gout, and DVT caused by oral BCPs. She is on lisinopril 10 mg daily, HCTZ 25 mg daily, allopurinol 100 mg daily, and a multivitamin daily. Labs show WBC 13,000/mm3, total bilirubin 0.8 mg/dL, direct bilirubin 0.6 mg/dL, Alk Phos 100 U/L, AST 45 U/L, and ALT 30 U/L. Eyes, HENT, GI, skin, neuro, and psych are unremarkable on physical examination.

Patient Diagnosis.

The patient in the case study is likely suffering from acute cholecystitis. According to Jones et al. (2022), acute cholecystitis is a condition that causes the gall bladder to be inflamed, thus causing severe pain, nausea, vomiting, and fever. Based on the symptoms presented by the patient, such as RUQ pain, nausea, and vomiting, the patient is likely suffering from acute cholecystitis. Further, the patient has elevated liver enzymes and bilirubin levels, which are indicators of acute cholecystitis (Jones et al., 2022). Lastly, the patient’s history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and gout are possible risk factors for acute cholecystitis (Anderloni & Fugazza, 2022)

Appropriate Drug Therapy Plan

The appropriate drug therapy for acute cholecystitis will include broad-spectrum antibiotics and painkillers. Specifically, this patient can have a combination of clavulanic acid and metronidazole, which should be

Please click the following link to purchase the full answer. Also, you can order customized paper now.

[purchase_link id=”570″ style=”button” color=”blue” text=”Purchase”]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

0

No products in the cart.